And I owe it all to one man...
Jason Radley (my best friend Jill's husband); who single-handedly brow-beat me for years until I finally agreed to start shooting RAW.
I had been shooting JPEGs since I got my first digital camera and I was quite happy with the results I was getting.
Most cameras come from the camera shop, set to take JPEGs. They also come from the camera shop set to automatically sharpen your photos and increase their contrast & saturation. All intended to give you great looking photos straight out of the camera.
So, when you take a JPEG, your camera first increases the sharpness, contrast and saturation of your photo, deletes any file information it deems insignificant and then compresses/flattens the file in order to fit more photos on a card. And viola, you've got a JPEG.
Unfortunately, when your camera deletes this "insignificant" information, it is deleting information that is vital to anyone who does much photo editing.
Shooting RAW prevents your camera from deleting any file information, which results in huge files, but allows the most control in photo editing. When you set your camera to capture RAW images, there is NO in camera sharpening, contrast or saturation boosts, which means that straight out of the camera RAW photos look worse than JPEGs (this was really hard for me to get used to after shooting JPEGs for so many years).
You have to have a special program to read RAW files (I have Adobe Camera Raw which is part of Adobe Photoshop CS3). So, I download my RAW files and open them in Adobe Camera RAW (ACR) where I do some general adjustments to all of my photos (you can select multiple photos to edit simultaneously). Once I have done those adjustments, I save all of the edited RAW files as JPEGs. Then, in Photoshop, I select my favorite photos and do some further editing. Usually using actions (my favorite combination is from Totally Rad Actions; 10% Derelicte, 25+% Oh Snap, 20% Boutwell's Magic Glasses and 20+% vignette and blur).
And then I save an edited version of my photo.
So here's what that process looks like:
The first photo is what my unedited RAW file looked like straight out of the camera (remember, RAW files usually look worse than JPEGs because they have not undergone any in-camera sharpening, contrast or saturation boosts).
The second photo is what my RAW file looked like after I edited it in Adobe Camera RAW.
The last photo is what my RAW file looked like after I converted it to a JPEG and applied a few actions to it.
All that said, shooting RAW is definitely not for everyone. JPEGs are ready to print as soon as you download them, no photo editing required (unless you want to). RAW files require conversion and need editing. Therefore, shooting RAW is really for people who consider photo editing a part of their regular workflow.
Now that I shoot RAW, I wouldn't go back to shooting JPEGs (but again, I was quite happy with my photos prior to shooting RAW). I take a ton of photos, so sometimes, the photo editing side of things can start to feel a little daunting. But overall, the time I invest feels well worth it as shooting RAW has really helped me to grow as a photographer (so thanks for pestering me into doing it Jason Radley).
Photo editing is not currently a part of the Photographers' Workshop. It's a big subject that really deserves its own seperate class (not sure if I'll ever be up for the challenge of teaching a class like that, although for now, I'm not ruling it out).
Have a great day.



































































































